When I look at modern military spending, drones and cyber units get so much attention, but I wonder if we've quietly pushed conventional ground forces to the back burner. My cousin served in the infantry, and he says the army is investing heavily in tech battalions while older armored divisions are getting outdated equipment. With asymmetric wars becoming more common, can a country really maintain both a high-tech force and a strong traditional military without straining its budget, and is that even the right priority? I'm genuinely torn because superior tech sounds great on paper, but history shows boots on the ground still matter in messy conflicts.