Should U.S. history textbooks include the uncomfortable parts?
School history textbooks in the U.S. often skip over the uncomfortable parts, like how many founding fathers owned slaves or the systemic violence during westward expansion. I've tutored high schoolers for years, and most of them graduate with a sanitized version of the past that doesn't prepare them for real civic discussions. Should we really keep trimming the rough edges to make history more patriotic and less divisive for students?