Is Manchester City's dominance about money more than tactics?
Manchester City's treble last season was historic, but in the Premier League, the real question is whether they've actually changed the competitive balance. I've watched City dominate possession for years, and while their consistency is undeniable, I wonder if we're mistaking financial muscle for footballing superiority. Arsenal pushed them to the wire with a younger squad and a fraction of the budget—does that suggest the gap is closing, or was it just a blip? I'm leaning toward saying City's dominance is more about resources than tactics, but I'm not fully certain.