Is it fair for governments to fund public broadcasting with taxpayer money when private media now covers most of the same ground? I pay for my local public radio station through taxes, and while I enjoy its in-depth reporting, my neighbor who never listens still foots the bill. Some argue public outlets fill a void in local news and fact-based journalism, especially in areas where commercial stations have cut back. But others see it as an outdated subsidy that distorts competition. Where do you draw the line between a public good and an unfair burden on citizens who never tune in?