Is Intermittent Fasting Better Than Calorie Counting?
Intermittent fasting is more than a diet trend—it's a lifestyle shift that many people adopt hoping to improve metabolic health. I've tried 16:8 fasting for six months, and while my energy stabilized, the hunger pangs during the first two weeks were brutal. However, the real question is whether skipping breakfast genuinely boosts metabolism or just reduces total calorie intake. Based on my experience and reading studies, the latter seems more likely, but the benefits of improved insulin sensitivity can't be ignored. So, is intermittent fasting actually superior to traditional calorie counting for long-term weight loss, or is it just another tool that works because it creates a deficit?