I visited the Tate Modern last week and saw an exhibit that was literally just a blank canvas with a single dot — and the room was packed. It got me thinking about why we label some things as 'art' while rejecting others. A few years ago, I felt the same way about abstract expressionism, but now I've come around to seeing value even in pieces that don't look 'skillful'. Is there a line where something stops being art, or is it all just a matter of perspective? I'm genuinely torn because I have friends who are artists and they say intent matters, while others argue craft must show.