Is luck more important than gear in street photography?
I've shot street photography for years, and I'm convinced that relying on luck—being at the right place at the right moment—is more essential than having expensive gear. My best shot, a kid jumping over a puddle, came from a $300 camera while my $3000 lens stayed home. But some argue that luck favors the prepared, and post-processing can rescue an average capture. Does the magic of a candid moment truly outweigh technical control, or are we just romanticizing chance?