I've been working as a network technician for eight years, and I've noticed how many rural communities still struggle with basic broadband access. We just installed fiber in a town of 1,200 people, and the difference in how they use the internet is striking. But is expanding high-speed infrastructure to every remote area really worth the massive cost, or should we focus on improving mobile coverage instead? I'm genuinely torn because while fiber is superior for stability, 5G can reach more people for less money, especially in mountainous regions where digging trenches is impractical. What do you think—should universal fiber access be the goal, or is wireless good enough for the last mile?