I've been reading Stoic philosophy for about five years now, and I keep circling back to this question: is Stoicism's core advice about focusing only on what's in our control actually a useful guide for modern life, or does it quietly justify passivity on issues that demand collective action? Climate change is the obvious test case—a Stoic might say my individual carbon footprint matters less than my attitude toward it, but that feels like a cop-out when I'm watching wildfires creep closer to communities I know. I don't doubt the therapeutic value of distinguishing between what I can and cannot influence; it's helped me sleep better at night more times than I can count. But I wonder if the framework, when applied politically, leans too heavily on personal resilience as a substitute for trying to change systems that are clearly broken. The tension isn't new, but I think it's sharpened every time I see someone shrug off an injustice with 'well, that's out of my hands' in a way that feels more like resignation than acceptance. What do you think—does Stoicism make us better citizens or just better at tolerating the unacceptable?