I've been an architect for twelve years, and I keep noticing how many modern buildings prioritize striking visuals over how people actually use the space day to day. A glass tower with a bold shape might win awards, but if the sun bakes the lobby into a greenhouse by noon and the floor plan forces awkward corners, is that truly good architecture? Should we judge buildings more by their daily livability and less by their photogenic qualities, or does the art itself justify some discomfort? What does "good design" really mean when it comes to long-term human experience?