I'm a high school teacher, and for years I've graded essays by hand, but last semester I experimented with AI feedback tools for drafting. The results surprised me: my students revised more thoroughly when a bot pointed out vague thesis statements than when I wrote the same comments in red ink. Still, I worry—if we lean on AI for formative feedback, are we teaching students to write for algorithms instead of readers? And what happens to the teacher-student relationship when the first round of critique comes from a machine that never gets tired or frustrated? I'm genuinely torn because efficiency and consistency are real benefits, but I can't shake the feeling that writing is deeply human, and outsourcing its evaluation might erode something we can't measure on a rubric.