Should annual reviews be replaced by continuous feedback?
Annual performance reviews often feel like a ritual where managers justify their existence rather than actually improving employee output. I've had reviews where vague criteria like 'leadership potential' determined my raise, while concrete achievements got ignored. Research shows real-time feedback beats once-a-year ratings, yet firms cling to outdated appraisals. Shouldn't we shift to continuous coaching and measurable goals instead of subjective quarterly judgments?